Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

8 Comments

  1. Couger has been always used [or atleast I have perceived it as] negative. Lets say we go by all the definitions and term a woman who is no longer in her 20s, who enjoys sexual company, of men older or younger than her, and is non committal. What’s negative about any of the above definitions?. I think people expect many things of their relationships, and “non commitment” is one among them, which both the genders seem to enjoy. So is the sexual company, why is it wrong if a not so young woman enjoys it. Isn’t that natural?

    The only thing negative about the term is, how these women are put across as being easy targets for men, and not the other way around [women trying to attack men]

    1. @Rambler: What’s negative? Nothing at all, except that in popular perception, these are coloured with dispproval and disrespect. But you’ve a valid point about their being easy targets.

  2. At least there’s a sexy thing bout ‘Cougar’..the male equivalent fr the cougar wud probably b spelled ‘U-N-C-L-E’ or ‘B-H-U-D-D-A’ or some other random unsexy term 🙂