AI Snape Sirius bullying

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One Comment

  1. I often think of my time in the HP fandom (I’d been a lurker around some of the popular sites in the early 2000s) and the many discussions on either side of the Snape debate. Especially the kind of reasonings and justifications Marauder fans would bring up to either justify or wave away their abuse. And it is striking to me how often the same words can be used in real life bullying situations too.

    Things like using Snape’s present behaviour to – in a very backwards way – justify what he suffered in school and at home. Things like painting the whole thing as a simple rivalry, rather than a constant barrage of four-on-one attacks, for the sole reason that “he exists, you know”.

    I’d seen some Marauder Stans even go as far as claiming that Snape’s innovative notes on his Potions Textbook were things he overheard James say (apparently because his father was an expert potioneer). An interesting headcanon and nothing more, but it gained so much traction that some even began to believe it! Which just goes to show how invested some readers were in erasing anything good that belonged to him. It was far easier to retcon than to acknowledge the very canonical gift that really WAS his own.

    I really loved the way you weaved in your thoughts on this work with your own experiences. No one piece of art can be interpreted exactly the same by two people, and one’s own personal context plays a big role in why. I recall – in my early twenties – trying to weakly excuse SWM* with the assumption that James had probably “grown up” (this was before Book 7 came out), because I wasn’t truly ready to think entirely negatively of some of my own bullies. To judge James harshly would be to judge harshly the bully I had once called my friend. So much of our readings into any piece of art emerge from our own lived experience.

    Loved this piece ❤️❤️❤️